“JOSEPH PLAZO TO FUTURE TRADERS: YOUR ALGORITHMS DON’T KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG”

“Joseph Plazo to Future Traders: Your Algorithms Don’t Know Right from Wrong”

“Joseph Plazo to Future Traders: Your Algorithms Don’t Know Right from Wrong”

Blog Article

At a regional summit of Asia’s most promising technocrats and business students, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.

MANILA — Plazo didn’t talk about speed or scale.

“If you hand over your portfolio to a machine,” he said, “you must ask: does it reflect your ethics—or just your ambitions?”

???? **He Built the Bot. But He’s Not Sure We’re Ready for It.**

He isn’t speaking from the sidelines. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.

And yet, his concern is clear: accuracy means little without accountability.

“Speed is seductive. But context is critical.”

He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.

“We overrode it. It was a machine doing math, not reading history.”

???? **Machines Act Fast. But Leadership Sometimes Waits.**

AI’s appeal lies in its instant execution. But at what cost?

“We must remember that a moment of hesitation can protect reputations—and futures.”

Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:

- Who takes responsibility if the code is flawless—but the outcome disastrous?
- Is there non-digital confirmation? What do experience, memory, and culture say?
- Does leadership end when the model takes over?

???? **As Fintech Booms, Where Are the Ethical Guardrails?**

Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.

But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “AI is moving capital—but is it moving it in the right direction?”

He cited the 2024 collapse click here of two Hong Kong hedge funds.

“It was failure by design—because no one was allowed to stop it.”

???? **The Alternative: Narrative AI That Considers More Than Numbers**

Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.

His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.

“The future isn’t faster bots—it’s smarter, humbler ones.”

At a private dinner after the event, multiple venture capital leaders discussed collaborations.

One investor called Plazo’s talk:

“A blueprint for ethical AI in an unequal world.”

???? **What Happens When No One Says ‘Stop’**

Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:

“We won’t be victims of chaos—but of unchecked confidence.”

It wasn’t fearmongering. It was foresight.

Because when machines take over the trades, conscience cannot be coded out.

Report this page